Skip to content

Takhar v. Holder

September 16, 2009

**Exhaustion of remedies**

The BIA found the IJ’s adverse credibility finding clearly erroneous. However, by not explicitly contesting in his BIA brief the IJ’s finding that he should have provided corroborating statement, Takhar failed to exhaust his claim that the BIA should have accepted his explanation for failing to produce corroborating evidence.

 

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2009/09/16/08-70020.pdf

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42 other followers