Skip to content

Kwong v. Holder

September 17, 2009

**212(c)/Equal Protection**

Under Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203, 1207 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc) both the class of aliens with “substantially identical” removable offenses to an excludable offense listed in § 212(a) and the class of aliens whose removable offenses have no § 212(a) counterpart are ineligible for relief under § 212(c). Therefore, Kwong’s equal protection challenges are moot.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2009/09/17/05-73522.pdf

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers