Skip to content

Gutierrez v. Holder

September 29, 2009

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of withholding of removal because Gutierrez failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not he would be persecuted if returned to El Salvador. Same for CAT claim.  Gutierrez’s other claims are foreclosed by Mejia v. Gonzales, 499 F.3d 991, 995-99 (9th Cir. 2007).

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2009/09/29/06-71337.pdf

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers