Skip to content

Kurniawaty v. Holder

October 27, 2009

**Credibility; withholding/disfavored group analysis**IJ’s adverse credibility determination not supported by substantial evidence because the IJ failed to point to inconsistencies in Kurniawaty’s testimony or offer other specific, cogent reasons for her disbelief of Kurniawaty’s Chinese ethnicity.  Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Kurniawaty failed to establish she suffered past persecution in Indonesia. However, because the BIA declined to apply the Sael disfavored group analysis in analyzing Kurniawaty’s future fear, the case must be remanded for consideration of whether Kurniawaty is entitled to withholding of removal under Sael and Wakkary.http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2009/10/27/06-74958.pdf

 

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42 other followers