Skip to content

Herard v. Holder

November 30, 2009

**Motion to reopen**

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Herard’s motion to reopen as untimely because the motion was filed more than five years after the final order of removal and Herard failed to demonstrate changed circumstances in Haiti to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limits for filing motions to reopen.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2009/11/30/08-73784.pdf

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers