Skip to content

Ahir v. Holder

December 30, 2009

**Motion to remand**

Because the BIA lacked jurisdiction to consider Ahir’s newly submitted evidence on appeal,  the BIA did not abuse its
discretion in concluding that Ahir failed to rebut the strong presumption of effective service arising from the service of his hearing notice by certified mail.  In addition, the BIA was within its discretion in declining to remand because the newly submitted evidence was previously available and could have been provided in support of Ahir’s motion to reopen.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2009/12/30/07-70515.pdf

 

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42 other followers