Gomez v. Holder
February 27, 2010
**MTR**
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Escobedo Gomez’s second motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred because it was filed over a year after the BIA’s August 2, 2005, final order, and equitable tolling is unavailable to Escobedo Gomez where he did not establish prejudice from the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/02/26/07-73368.pdf
No comments yet
newimmigrationcases
