Skip to content

Rodriguez Zenteno v. Holder

February 28, 2010

**Motion to remand, IAC**

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to remand due to ineffective assistance of counsel because they failed to comply with the Lozada requirements and the ineffective assistance they allege is not plain on the face of the record.  It follows that Petitioners’ due process claim fails.  The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to remand to introduce evidence because the BIA considered the evidence they submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining that it was insufficient to warrant reopening.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/02/26/07-75059.pdf

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers