Skip to content

Gutierrez Colocho v. Holder

March 1, 2010

**MTR**

The agency acted within its discretion in denying as number barred Gutierrez Colocho’s second motion to reopen before the IJ.  The BIA did not abuse its discretion in declining to equitably toll the numerical limitation on motions to reopen because the record does not support Gutierrez Colocho’s claim that prior counsel either filed Gutierrez Colocho’s first motion to reopen pro se, or otherwise provided ineffective legal assistance.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/03/01/06-74781.pdf

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42 other followers