Skip to content

Hernandez Velasquez v. Holder (PUB)

July 14, 2010

**Change of address form, notice/”presumption of mailing, MTR”**

The BIA abused its discretion in failing to discuss Hernandez’s declaration and the attached photocopied Change of Address form in its decision, thereby failing to consider the“weight and consequences” of that evidence in its denial of her motion to reopen.  The BIA was required to undertake such an analysis before ruling on the veracity of both Hernandez’s claim that she mailed a Change of Address form and her claim that she did not receive notice from the BIA of its decision.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/07/14/06-75728.pdf

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42 other followers