Skip to content

Maldonado-Chinchilla v. Holder (unpub)

July 19, 2010
tags:

**Persecution/rape/DV, gov’t control**

Maldonado-Chinchilla testified that her boyfriend raped her, and that she suffered other domestic violence. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Maldonado-Chinchilla did not establish the abuse she suffered constituted persecution because she failed to show the government was unwilling or unable to protect her from her boyfriend.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/07/19/07-74615.pdf

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers