Tan v. Holder (unpub)
July 19, 2010
**MTR, changed circumstances**
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Tan’s third motion to reopen as number-barred and untimely where the motion was filed nineteen years after the final order of deportation was entered in his case, and Tan failed to establish changed circumstances in China to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitation.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/07/19/07-72718.pdf
No comments yet
