Ye v. Holder (unpub)
July 19, 2010
**MTR/change circumstances**
Ye filed a motion to reopen based on the birth of two children in the United States. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ye’s motion to reopen as untimely because she filed it 11 years after the BIA issued its final order, and Ye failed to demonstrate changed circumstances in China to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit for filing motions to reopen.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/07/19/07-73284.pdf
No comments yet
newimmigrationcases
