Huang v. Holder (unpub)
July 29, 2010
**Credibility**
Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s adverse credibility determination because the inconsistencies identified by the agency regarding how Huang obtained his B-1 visa, whether his documents were mailed to him eight or twelve months after his arrival in the United States, and whether the Chinese doctor ordered two weeks of rest are minor and do not got to the heart of his claim of religious persecution. Furthermore, lack of authentication of Huang’s employment termination notice is an insufficient reason for deeming it unreliable.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/07/29/07-75046.pdf
No comments yet
newimmigrationcases
