Pan v. Holder (unpub)
July 29, 2010
**MTR, changed circs.**
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Pan’s motion to reopen as untimely where the motion was filed over two years after the BIA’s final administrative decision, and Pan failed to establish changed circumstances in China to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitation.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/07/29/07-75130.pdf
No comments yet
newimmigrationcases
