Skip to content

Quiroz v. Holder (unpub)

July 29, 2010

**COR, MTR, IAC**

 The BIA abused its discretion when it determined that petitioner Maria Valdovinos Quiroz’s untimely motion to reopen was not subject to equitable tolling of the motions deadline.  Ineffective assistance of counsel is plain on the face of the record. At the initial hearing on remand, Maria’s former counsel failed to inform the IJ that her U.S. citizen daughter, who the BIA had earlier noted suffers from “serious” paranoid schizophrenia, would soon turn 21 years old.  As a result, once the daughter, Ana, turned 21, she was no longer a “qualifying relative” for Maria, and the IJ was unable to consider Maria’s application for cancellation of removal.  Remand for a prejudice determination, and any other equitable relief the agency may consider appropriate, including any relief for which Ana may be eligible.  The Court also stays the mandate, and refer these petitions to the Circuit Mediator to explore possible resolution through mediation.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/07/29/08-70983.pdf

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers