Singh v. Holder (unpub)
July 29, 2010
**MTR; due process**
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reopen because Singh failed to present material, previously unavailable evidence of changed circumstances in India, and he failed to establish prima facie eligibility to reopen to apply for relief under CAT. Singh’s contention that the BIA did not consider the relevant facts fails because he has not overcome the presumption that the BIA reviewed the record.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/07/29/07-73809.pdf
No comments yet
newimmigrationcases
