Singh v. Holder (unpub)
July 29, 2010
**MTR**
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in its March 28, 2008, order denying petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred because it was the second motion to reopen, filed nearly three after the BIA’s final decision, and the petitioners failed to present sufficient evidence of changed circumstances in India to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time and numerical limitation.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2010/07/29/08-71570.pdf
No comments yet
newimmigrationcases
