Parmar v. Holder (unpub)
November 23, 2011
Credibility
While the government rightly concedes that the IJ erred in some of her characterizations of Parmar’s testimony, the determination made by the IJ and BIA nonetheless was supported by substantial evidence. The IJ and BIA noted that Parmar was unresponsive, especially regarding questions about the arrest and detention that Parmar claimed precipitated his flight from India. There were also inconsistencies in Parmar’s testimony, notably regarding the timing of his third arrest.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2011/11/23/08-70109.pdf
No comments yet
newimmigrationcases
