Singh v. Holder (unpub)
November 23, 2011
MTR
The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Singh’s motion to reopen as untimely because the motion was filed over five years after the BIA’s final order and Singh failed to present material evidence of changed circumstances in India to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitation for filing motions to reopen.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2011/11/23/10-73463.pdf
No comments yet
newimmigrationcases
